I’d been meaning to post this for the past week or two.
Branson warns that oil crunch is coming within five years
“The next five years will see us face another crunch – the oil crunch. This time, we do have the chance to prepare. The challenge is to use that time well,” Branson will say.
“Our message to government and businesses is clear: act,” he says in a foreword to a new report on the crisis. “Don’t let the oil crunch catch us out in the way that the credit crunch did.”
Other British executives who will support the warning include Ian Marchant, chief executive of Scottish and Southern Energy group, and Brian Souter, chief executive of transport operator Stagecoach.
Their call for urgent government action comes amid a wider debate on the issue and follows allegations by insiders at the International Energy Agency that the organisation had deliberately underplayed the threat of so-called “peak oil” to avoid panic on the stock markets.
Ministers have until now refused to take predictions of oil droughts seriously, preferring to side with oil companies such as BP and ExxonMobil and crude producers such as the Saudis, who insist there is nothing to worry about.
And in particular, this was also interesting…
Chris Skrebowski, an independent oil consultant who prepared parts of the peak oil report for Branson and others, said that only recession is holding back a crisis: “The next major supply constraint, along with spiking oil prices, will not occur until recession-hit demand grows to the point that it removes the current excess oil stocks and the large spare capacity held by Opec. However, once these are removed, possibly as early as 2012-13 and no later than 2014-15, oil prices are likely to spike, imperilling economic growth and causing economic dislocation.”
Something like this could possibly kill the suburbs and place a sudden demand on urban dwelling, and residences closer to work or more central to the major locations in a families life.
It should be interesting to see what happens.
Isn’t Branson head of: Virgin Mobile, which produces phones that require the use of petroleum products to produce.; Virgin Airlines, which uses a fuckton of fuel to operate; and Virgin Galactic, which could become the biggest consumer of fossil fuels in his operations.
Now, is he actually himself within his company pushing for his researchers to find alternate ways to run these businesses, or does he have an ulterior motive in pushing for legislation? I’m not saying I don’t agree. I think we’re going to get caught with our pants down as far as an energy crisis, but coming from Branson, as much as I admire him for his business acumen, I have to question his motives.
